The film production implies the integration and interaction
of a set of specialized agents in areas where, in other arts, they appear as
dominant, but in the case of cinema, they are co-participants.
The fact that the filmmaker makes the crucial decisions in
the film making does not take out the co-authorship of the other agents involved
with the film production. By following this perspective, what is observed is
that these interactions (MORIN, 2008, p.105) that compose and shape a film's
realization are configured as systemic, this is a set of semiotic agents with
specific functions that interact towards the final attempt: to complish the
work.
Thus, a film is not only signed by an author, but by a set
of authors, whose specialties complement each other in a recursive poli-circuit
(MORIN, ibid., P. 231) of concessions, cooperations and associations between
participating competencies.
In this kind of diverse and rich talent environment, there
is always, in degrees greater or lesser, the risk of the entropy (MORIN, ibid.,
P. 94), the process that triggers the lost of a syntactic cohesion and semantic
coherence, harming the intersemiotic exchanges between its various layers of
meaning. These layers of meaning are coined and intertwined by the integrality
and organization of the director of photography, art director, costume
designer, actor and actress, music composer, screenwriter, director, etc. within
a complex whole, the film.
Areas such as art direction and also the production design
are intrinsically related on film's visual identity. These professionals have
the responsibility to translate into images the concept idealized by the
director and exposed on the script by the verbal language. In this way, an
aesthetic vision of a film gains its first contours when passing through the
mind of these visual designers.
Everything that appears on a fiction movie passes through
its sieve, that is, every detail of the visual arrangement of the moving image
has his/her touch. Therefore, this department is so crucial for the film
director, because if, on the one hand, the script develops information on the
paths of the story to be told, on the other, it is an art diretor, and also the
production designer, who gives the visual dimension on what it was verbal.
Thus, they work to situate the aspects and characteristics of visual
representation, to be used in a film and to allow this aesthetic ideal sought
by the filmmaker to become tangible, palpable.A film direction implies not a
specialization, but a poly-functionality (MORIN, 2005, p. 346) is a
multifaceted view of the integrating and copulating interrelations in and in
which the poetics of cinema are immersed. He is an author who not only has to
look at his creative process but also the market as ways of studying and a way
how he will undertake his career / style.
From the filmmaker's point of view, the art director and the
production designer play both a key role in his/her process of consolidating a
career / style, because he/she is a co-author of its own cinematic poetics.
Both share the same creative ambition and career. This bond, between filmmaker
and art director/production designer, is established the moment they realize
that the film / work becomes something bigger because of the associations,
collaborations and mutual adjustments on their performances, therefore, they
are ecodependent. This ecodependent environment brings them their creative
autonomy in relation to the film (s) and in relation to their professional life
in future projects, as a team.
This ecological action, in which each member influences the
creative work of the other in an ecodependent dialog, alerts us to the fact
that the film production occurs in a complex and systemic environment. Thus,
when this collaborative process emerges and evolves in a positive way, it is a
two-way path guided by an empathy that renews itself, retroacts, permeates and
surges throughout the phases of pre-production, production / shooting and
post-production. This empathy allows competencies to enter into a stream of
complementarity, that is, into a synergy of meaning.
However, such a work environment is not something simple to
find or promote, because it depends on all the parties involved by exercising
their tolerances, sharings, concessions and affinities. That is why when a
director 'finds' a team whose members share the same synergy, this team remains
with the filmmaker throughout his/her career and / or for many films, that is
because it is the team that allows 'his/her-their' and also 'their-his/her'
poetics and style. The filmmaker never walks alone, his/her style flourish
through and among his/her team.
References:
MORIN,
Edgar. (2008) O Método 1 – a natureza da natureza. Porto Alegre: Editora
Sulina.
_____________
(2005) O Método 2 – a vida da vida. Porto Alegre: Editora Sulina.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário